|
Originally Posted by ForeverJacquie
So convicted pedophiles and abuser should not only have access to their children, to as not infringe on their rights, but have equal access to?
|
When did I say that? Honestly! Get real.
|
So a man who never visits his children EVER should be able to show up on his ex's door and demand visitation years and years later, and not have any consequences because he happens to be "the father".
|
Actually, yes. Consequences? Of course. It should be done gradually.
|
What the ****? Where did you get the 40 % number from. I didn't see it in your sited quotes. Please site your source.
|
Learn to read.
|
Originally Posted by jacie
That more needs to be done to protect children’s relationships with their parents after divorce cannot be reasonably denied. In a study published in the American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 40% of divorced mothers admitted that they had interfered with their ex-husband's access or visitation, and that their motives were punitive in nature and not due to safety considerations."
http://www.glennsacks.com/north_dakota_shared.htm |
Maybe this is why you never understand what I say. You don't read.
Typical narrow-mindedness.
Do you not realize that if we had mandatory shared custody in our province that many of the absent dads would not be absent? But you don't actually care about that, do you? You don't care about reforming the system so that more fathers are in their children's lives. You care about remaining the dominant sex when it comes to parenting. That's it.
You can keep throwing my DH's situation into this, if you want to be petty. I am done talking about it. This is a general discussion. Everyone already knows you hate DH. No-one cares what your opinion of DH is.
Anyways, his son loves him to death!!!!!!!! And is starting to realize his mother is a liar. It's all good! And that is all that matters, sweetheart!