I think it varies. I know many many many many women who have completely lost it all in their divorces and have had to fight tooth and nail for any penny they ever see from their ex's. I see their ex's living high on the hog and getting away with it all.
The one girl I know who was not following things and causing trouble for her ex was pulled back into court, was told off by the judge and told how much she would lose if she continued with this. She backed off. I honestly do not know how far the judge would've taken things. I think it unfair to assume that it never happens though.
|
See? You automatically assume the mother has custody and the father gets to 'visit' (not parent) his children. Unfair from the start.
|
You are being ridiculously silly here. I am only thinking of the cases that I personally know. In all of those cases not one of the fathers wanted full time custody of the children. They were more then happy to give that over to mother. They (in the cases that I personally know) knew it is was twice the work and they were more then happy to give that over to the mother. I have never assumed that all cases are like this. I always assume that the children should go to who can parent them the best and no I do not care whether or not it is the mother or the father. Do I think that the courts have always or are always fair in this? Absolutely not. Nor do I think the courts are always automatically fair to the women. As I said, I know many many many women who have been completely screwed over by their ex's and the courts and they continue to get away with it.